StellarStoic💭 Old account -- 1119d I agree but lightning as a node operator is not ok. I need to pay in front (open inbound channels) and to pay, I need to open an outbound channel to be be to sent. I want lightning ⚡ to be easy for node operators like if I have 1k sats in my lightning wallet, I wanted it to be able yo send at least 999 sats out and to be able receive any amount sender has sent to my wallet. replyI agree but lightning as a node operator is not ok. I need to pay in front (open inbound channels) and to pay, I need to open an outbound channel to be be to sent. I want lightning ⚡ to be easy for node operators like if I have 1k sats in my lightning wallet, I wanted it to be able yo send at least 999 sats out and to be able receive any amount sender has sent to my wallet.
thread · root 0e065d44…88ac · depth 2 · · selected 09fca61f…2555
thread
root 0e065d44…88ac · depth 2 · · selected 09fca61f…2555
Nostr is the number one use case for Lightning at the moment. The crypto crowd is relentlessly pushing their“faster blockchain” message to promote their token du jour, and there hasn’t been a lot of pushback on that yet.This means we have to be the ones to educate others about Lightning.It’s not enough to just talk about bitcoin, because the world will never be able to transact on-chain foreveryday payments. Lightning is the killer app, but it still gets overlooked like a curious novelty.
I agree but lightning as a node operator is not ok. I need to pay in front (open inbound channels) and to pay, Ineed to open an outbound channel to be be to sent.I want lightning ⚡ to be easy for node operators like if I have 1k sats in my lightning wallet, I wanted it tobe able yo send at least 999 sats out and to be able receive any amount sender has sent to my wallet.