+- DefiantDandelion -- 6mo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[...]+ | | | You wanted to know how the state incites violence. And how they are inciting violence particularly in this case. | | I’ve described it. Mass arrests of non violent offenders in a heavy visual presence, disturbing the life in | | residential areas, by people not trained to police while respecting constitutional rights, predictably create the | | protests. Heavy handed crowd control predictably radicalizes the protesters. Videos of the protestors being violent | | is the outcome the state wants so that it can justify bringing in the national guard and polarize the population. | | | | What is the possible probable cause of arresting a natural born citizen because you didn’t have an ID on you while | | being outside your apartment. Since they turn out to be a citizen it can’t be that they have paperwork with your | | name on it back at the office. They are arresting because they don’t know who you are, not because they know who you | | are and they have some prior evidence you committed a crime. Arresting someone because you’re not sure if they | | didn’t commit a crime is all kinds of constitutional violations. The ask is not to me on how they can satisfy the | | base without inciting violence. The ask is for them on how can they enforce the law without violating the rights of | | people. | | | | The fact that the state is presently pursing the enforcement while appearing to not care about the rights of people | | is the point of the protests in many cases. | | | +-- reply --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---+You wanted to know how the state incites violence. And how they are inciting violence particularly in this case. I’ve described it. Mass arrests of non violent offenders in a heavy visual presence, disturbing the life in residential areas, by people not trained to police while respecting constitutional rights, predictably create the protests. Heavy handed crowd control predictably radicalizes the protesters. Videos of the protestors being violent is the outcome the state wants so that it can justify bringing in the national guard and polarize the population. What is the possible probable cause of arresting a natural born citizen because you didn’t have an ID on you while being outside your apartment. Since they turn out to be a citizen it can’t be that they have paperwork with your name on it back at the office. They are arresting because they don’t know who you are, not because they know who you are and they have some prior evidence you committed a crime. Arresting someone because you’re not sure if they didn’t commit a crime is all kinds of constitutional violations. The ask is not to me on how they can satisfy the base without inciting violence. The ask is for them on how can they enforce the law without violating the rights of people. The fact that the state is presently pursing the enforcement while appearing to not care about the rights of people is the point of the protests in many cases.
thread · root 1638e8e0…30f2 · depth 1 · · selected 1638e8e0…30f2
thread
root 1638e8e0…30f2 · depth 1 · · selected 1638e8e0…30f2
You wanted to know how the state incites violence. And how they are inciting violence particularly in this case.I’ve described it. Mass arrests of non violent offenders in a heavy visual presence, disturbing the life inresidential areas, by people not trained to police while respecting constitutional rights, predictably createthe protests. Heavy handed crowd control predictably radicalizes the protesters. Videos of the protestors beingviolent is the outcome the state wants so that it can justify bringing in the national guard and polarize thepopulation.What is the possible probable cause of arresting a natural born citizen because you didn’t have an ID on youwhile being outside your apartment. Since they turn out to be a citizen it can’t be that they have paperworkwith your name on it back at the office. They are arresting because they don’t know who you are, not becausethey know who you are and they have some prior evidence you committed a crime. Arresting someone because you’renot sure if they didn’t commit a crime is all kinds of constitutional violations. The ask is not to me on howthey can satisfy the base without inciting violence. The ask is for them on how can they enforce the law withoutviolating the rights of people.The fact that the state is presently pursing the enforcement while appearing to not care about the rights ofpeople is the point of the protests in many cases.
