jb55 -- 137d makes sense replymakes sense
thread · root 01ddd8ac…46cf · depth 12 · · selected 4d844640…ff25
thread
root 01ddd8ac…46cf · depth 12 · · selected 4d844640…ff25
Do NIP-17 DM app enjoyers utilize one-on-one chats, group chats, or both?cc nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqnnostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5znostr:npub10td4yrp6cl9kmjp9x5yd7r8pm96a5j07lk5mtj2kw39qf8frpt8qm9x2wlnostr:npub107jk7htfv243u0x5ynn43scq9wrxtaasmrwwa8lfu2ydwag6cx2quqncxgnostr:npub1ye5ptcxfyyxl5vjvdjar2ua3f0hynkjzpx552mu5snj3qmx5pzjscpknprnostr:npub1zfss807aer0j26mwp2la0ume0jqde3823rmu97ra6sgyyg956e0s6xw445
Which can do group chats?
Here is an imperfect tracker: https://github.com/nostrability/nostrability/issues/169
So only Flotilla and Coracle?
nostr:npub1gm7gw8q6akeft2pjt270we35vlff0v9g2fene6cxkz2h68q5hl6qls0fte too
And nostr:npub1tm99pgz2lth724jeld6gzz6zv48zy6xp4n9xu5uqrwvx9km54qaqkkxn72
Amethyst does group chat too
Issue that nostr:npub1fgz3pungsr2quse0fpjuk4c5m8fuyqx2d6a3ddqc4ek92h6hf9ns0mjeck is running into:> another thing I find broken with chatroom is you can't have multiple chats with the same set of people, theconversations would simply combine
Yep, that's by design
we'll support it but feels like a bad design, whats the use case ?
To keep it simple. Topic-based approach has way too many edge cases that needs to be dealt with.
makes sense
Which can do group chats?
elsat -- 137d [parent] | reply [1 reply]Here is an imperfect tracker: https://github.com/nostrability/nostrability/issues/169
dab6c606…07b6 -- 137d [parent] | reply [1 reply]So only Flotilla and Coracle?
7fa56f5d…c194 -- 137d [parent] | reply [1 reply]nostr:npub1gm7gw8q6akeft2pjt270we35vlff0v9g2fene6cxkz2h68q5hl6qls0fte too
elsat -- 137d [parent] | reply [1 reply]And nostr:npub1tm99pgz2lth724jeld6gzz6zv48zy6xp4n9xu5uqrwvx9km54qaqkkxn72
460c25e6…065c -- 137d [parent] | reply [1 reply]Amethyst does group chat too
jb55 -- 137d [parent] | reply [1 reply]Issue that nostr:npub1fgz3pungsr2quse0fpjuk4c5m8fuyqx2d6a3ddqc4ek92h6hf9ns0mjeck is running into: > another thing I find broken with chatroom is you can't have multiple chats with the same set of people, the conversations would simply combine
460c25e6…065c -- 137d [parent] | reply [1 reply]Yep, that's by design
460c25e6…065c -- 137d [parent] | reply [1 reply]To keep it simple. Topic-based approach has way too many edge cases that needs to be dealt with.