The Daniel 🖖 -- 174d No, Lightning isn’t dead, but it’s moving to become what it always should be, the interoperability standard between different bitcoin layers. Running lightning channels isn’t suitable for everyday users. They need a noncustodial option that just works, and there’s a race to find the right way to do it. It’s great to see all this competition, it will be healthy for bitcoin in the long run. replyNo, Lightning isn’t dead, but it’s moving to become what it always should be, the interoperability standard between different bitcoin layers. Running lightning channels isn’t suitable for everyday users. They need a noncustodial option that just works, and there’s a race to find the right way to do it. It’s great to see all this competition, it will be healthy for bitcoin in the long run.
thread · root 2cb32f4f…c01b · depth 3 · · selected 544007ab…7195
thread
root 2cb32f4f…c01b · depth 3 · · selected 544007ab…7195
Just made a 999 sat payment between two wallets using the Ark protocol with zero fee.https://i.nostr.build/r10CZ3jcImgTiJTp.pngnostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpmnw5yatnljuff5w47d35d87q99xddqpzlzsac4xzn6vm22ekmn5qydhwumn8ghj7argv4nx7un9wd6zumn0wd68yvfwvdhk6tcpzemhxue69uhkzem8wghxummnw3ezumrpdejz7qgkwaehxw309a5xjum59ehx7um5wghxcctwvshsqgp7kggljj4vcpfrf2yv2xfv5lf4ar3794t306su3ga4ye5gumnkxsz2jtjx
so….is lightning dead?or is that lightning but better?
No, Lightning isn’t dead, but it’s moving to become what it always should be, the interoperability standardbetween different bitcoin layers. Running lightning channels isn’t suitable for everyday users. They need anoncustodial option that just works, and there’s a race to find the right way to do it. It’s great to see allthis competition, it will be healthy for bitcoin in the long run.
so….is lightning dead?
or is that lightning but better?