RedTailHawk -- 35d Everything that exists is love/light so by choosing not to find a way to love everything to some degree or another, you are the one imposing limits. By drawing lines that create an "us" and a "them", you are imposing limits. By drawing lines, you create the conditions that allow victims and victors to exist. There is no victim or victor when there is no separation. I'm going to mute you now. replyEverything that exists is love/light so by choosing not to find a way to love everything to some degree or another, you are the one imposing limits. By drawing lines that create an "us" and a "them", you are imposing limits. By drawing lines, you create the conditions that allow victims and victors to exist. There is no victim or victor when there is no separation. I'm going to mute you now.
thread · root fff81265…1f11 · depth 11 · · selected 57fd92df…5ab1
thread
root fff81265…1f11 · depth 11 · · selected 57fd92df…5ab1
nostr:nprofile1q9phwue69uhk76tjwe4xy7ndven8yvmkxgmnwdr20gmhxdf4w9ekxm3jxa3kw6f5xe5xk6tr09nxgcmxxvekgmtzwdu8wdtk095kgtn0de5k7mspp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqqyq25nm2tuuw35u829h9yt9kdp32vvxh2fpwxunj63jjxxavvnrw558eq9zq on theproblem of evilhttps://blossom.primal.net/c50c9c6dfe0663f22fe9e7ac437f232449c683c99d8f0942701a408a5a4ba474.mp4Source: Keyvan Davani Show #261: THE EARTH DISASTER CYCLE & BITCOIN.https://fountain.fm/episode/pvErgjI5bqDDy5AyGMk5nostr:npub15n4g2my68w8xtm99e0e66m53thxftp32pxacrq5zw3mmgqhl87pq5wsrrkSome additional thoughts from yours truly:nostr:naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzqqn3uxu6m9lr790dws3j03ww5dynh4nzsps3vw9h5rmw9zkcelusqq25g4pctacnzu6xg984scn5945rqkf5vftkc5rp696
Great naïve model IMHO, but there are many lenses to choose from. Yes they can all be right and wrong at thesame time. (Venn Diagram)Most powers that be are deemed evil because they are spending other peoples money on somebody else. Yes thatsounds like a gardener or farmer. Farmer is a great way to think about the ultimate form of predation(domestication).So you will be domesticated, and be happy about it... No thanks brahhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHdRT9t1V2E
Your criticism is premature.Typically the way it works is you wrap your mind as completely as possible around a perspective before youcriticize it.You heard a less than one minute long clip.
How is my response not taking on the perspective of our enemy?
You called my perspective naive.I told you you were being prejudicial for judging my perspective after having only heard a 1 minute clip.That's like judging a book by its cover.You did attempt to take on the perspective of those that you consider to be your enemies.Your usage of the word "our" in that post is extremely dishonest and underhanded.I choose not to emulate your example of prejudice.I choose not to emulate your attachment to having enemies.I choose not to emulate your underhanded usage of snuck premises.Thank you for showing me those examples of how a person can be for my consideration to emulate or not.Your life is a precious gift. Keep being you in whatever way you choose.
So wait, people who spend other peoples' money on other people wouldn't be considered an enemy? Even AlanTurning was a pacifist, but he still fought in the war.
You're addicted to the us vs them mentality.Everyone is an example of a manner of being that can be emulated or avoided in part or in whole.Alan Turing is no exception.I can choose to emulate some aspects of his manner of being while avoiding others.As an example, I'm not gay, but he was, so I won't be emulating that aspect of his personality.I wouldn't go to war, but I would kill a rabid dog if it was attacking an innocent toddler.
I see, you don't operate at scale. I get it. It's cool 👍
Have fun staying spiritually poor.
Exactly.A person's capacity for growth is directly linked to how much truth they can face about themselves withoutrunning away.Your limits don't diminish my capacity to create conflict at scale against those who spend other peoples' moneyon other people. I will not nurture the conditions that allow victimization by refusing to pick sides.
Everything that exists is love/light so by choosing not to find a way to love everything to some degree oranother, you are the one imposing limits.By drawing lines that create an "us" and a "them", you are imposing limits.By drawing lines, you create the conditions that allow victims and victors to exist.There is no victim or victor when there is no separation.I'm going to mute you now.
Great naïve model IMHO, but there are many lenses to choose from. Yes they can all be right and wrong at the same time. (Venn Diagram)
Most powers that be are deemed evil because they are spending other peoples money on somebody else. Yes that sounds like a gardener or farmer. Farmer is a great way to think about the ultimate form of predation (domestication).
So you will be domesticated, and be happy about it... No thanks brah
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHdRT9t1V2E
RedTailHawk -- 49d [parent] | reply [1 reply]Your criticism is premature. Typically the way it works is you wrap your mind as completely as possible around a perspective before you criticize it. You heard a less than one minute long clip.
7e07163a…86aa -- 37d [parent] | reply [1 reply]How is my response not taking on the perspective of our enemy?
RedTailHawk -- 36d [parent] | reply [1 reply]You called my perspective naive. I told you you were being prejudicial for judging my perspective after having only heard a 1 minute clip. That's like judging a book by its cover. You did attempt to take on the perspective of those that you consider to be your enemies. Your usage of the word "our" in that post is extremely dishonest and underhanded. I choose not to emulate your example of prejudice. I choose not to emulate your attachment to having enemies. I choose not to emulate your underhanded usage of snuck premises. Thank you for showing me those examples of how a person can be for my consideration to emulate or not. Your life is a precious gift. Keep being you in whatever way you choose.
7e07163a…86aa -- 36d [parent] | reply [1 reply]So wait, people who spend other peoples' money on other people wouldn't be considered an enemy? Even Alan Turning was a pacifist, but he still fought in the war.
RedTailHawk -- 36d [parent] | reply [1 reply]You're addicted to the us vs them mentality. Everyone is an example of a manner of being that can be emulated or avoided in part or in whole. Alan Turing is no exception. I can choose to emulate some aspects of his manner of being while avoiding others. As an example, I'm not gay, but he was, so I won't be emulating that aspect of his personality. I wouldn't go to war, but I would kill a rabid dog if it was attacking an innocent toddler.
7e07163a…86aa -- 35d [parent] | reply [1 reply]I see, you don't operate at scale. I get it. It's cool 👍
RedTailHawk -- 35d [parent] | reply [1 reply]Have fun staying spiritually poor.
7e07163a…86aa -- 35d [parent] | reply [1 reply]Exactly. A person's capacity for growth is directly linked to how much truth they can face about themselves without running away. Your limits don't diminish my capacity to create conflict at scale against those who spend other peoples' money on other people. I will not nurture the conditions that allow victimization by refusing to pick sides.