jb55 -- 137d yeah i'm definitely leaning toward a new kind nostr:npub1fgz3pungsr2quse0fpjuk4c5m8fuyqx2d6a3ddqc4ek92h6hf9ns0mjeck replyyeah i'm definitely leaning toward a new kind nostr:npub1fgz3pungsr2quse0fpjuk4c5m8fuyqx2d6a3ddqc4ek92h6hf9ns0mjeck
thread · root ab6ffe5f…dadb · depth 9 · · selected 600c146f…33bf
thread
root ab6ffe5f…dadb · depth 9 · · selected 600c146f…33bf
now that we have giftwraps in damus android/notedeck/ios and a DM app in progress, I am thinking about startingwork on a nostr mail client.this would be like nip17, but except for direct messages, you would have full email-like threads with tagging,search, archive/read states.once we have this we can start working on zap-based nostr mail prioritization.after this we can start integrating this nostr inbox into nostr git workflows.i will eventually replace all my productivity apps with nostr alternatives, with zaps as the noise andprioritization filter. it will be glorious. #damuswork
can't it just be the kinds in nip-17 with an extra subject tag or something?
do nip17 clients handle threaded replies?
Mine ignore the subject tag and reply hierarchies, but there's no reason you couldn't add them
having them interoperable might be interesting for sure, i just don't want to spam DM clients with broken stuff
I don't think ot would be too broken to naively merge threads. Maybe a little confusing, but it would nudgeimplementations to support the full spec
thoughts nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z ?
We show the parent reply inside the chat buble itself. Subject renames the group chat to whatever people want.If you want to group by subject (like email), you might need a new kind. Kind 14 requires grouping by the peoplein the group, like discord/slack does.I don't know if I like threading to do email-like things, created at order is so good.
yeah i'm definitely leaning toward a new kindnostr:npub1fgz3pungsr2quse0fpjuk4c5m8fuyqx2d6a3ddqc4ek92h6hf9ns0mjeck
can't it just be the kinds in nip-17 with an extra subject tag or something?
97c70a44…e322 -- 137d [parent] | reply [1 reply]Mine ignore the subject tag and reply hierarchies, but there's no reason you couldn't add them
jb55 -- 137d [parent] | reply [1 reply]having them interoperable might be interesting for sure, i just don't want to spam DM clients with broken stuff
97c70a44…e322 -- 137d [parent] | reply [1 reply]I don't think ot would be too broken to naively merge threads. Maybe a little confusing, but it would nudge implementations to support the full spec
460c25e6…065c -- 137d [parent] | reply [1 reply]We show the parent reply inside the chat buble itself. Subject renames the group chat to whatever people want. If you want to group by subject (like email), you might need a new kind. Kind 14 requires grouping by the people in the group, like discord/slack does. I don't know if I like threading to do email-like things, created at order is so good.