Plain Text Nostr

<-- back to main feed

thread · root 8e44ab5f…a18b · depth 4 · · selected 68860a9f…a739

thread

root 8e44ab5f…a18b · depth 4 · · selected 68860a9f…a739

8a719d42…0fe5 -- 698d [parent] 
|    You'd need your phone not to be linked to your id. Ideally without an IMEI number (if that's possible). You
|    would have to make sure your email, social media BANKING on your phone were totally anonymous. Even if you're
|    using an esim which is not connected to your id, your phone will still track your movements.
|    
|    Most threat levels won't warrant such paranoia but don't be fooled. I love and use Graphene btw
|    reply [1 reply]
Edward Snowden -- 698d
If you take your phone between even just your home and work —doxxed locations— it is trivial to associate it
with your true-name identity even if all of the hardware and services are perfectly anonymous. Even journalists
have managed these kind of investigations. "Anonymized" location data is unfortunely not anonymous — it *can
never* be anonymous. And yet it is sold like any other product.

Your phone's movements through physical space are unique. Even if you live in a building of 400 people, the
movements of 399 of them are not going to match the tower records of your phone's movements. Even if you work in
the same office. People's geographic movements are unique—and identifying.
reply [1 reply]
Edward Snowden -- 698d [parent] 
     I'm not trying to make you guys wrap yourself in tinfoil— almost nobody needs to be as paranoid as I am, and
     even I am tremendously lazy about opsec these days. The key is *awareness*: to simply be cognizant of what kind
     of records you're generating as you go about your life, so you can make informed, reasoned judgments about how
     much of it you can leave hanging out, and what parts of it you'd rather pay an effort-tax to shield from
     appearing in somebody's (or everybody's) database.
     reply [1 reply]

Write a post

Sign in with a signing-capable method to publish.