Plain Text Nostr

<-- back to main feed

thread · root ec207edf…caff · depth 4 · · selected a4b174a8…5c69

thread

root ec207edf…caff · depth 4 · · selected a4b174a8…5c69

DanWedge -- 381d [parent] 
|    The question is a bit rhetorical. The idea that an individual would not create policies that favour themselves
|    is absolute regardless of morals. The ability to wield power will mean it use be abused eventually.
|    
|    Bitcoin removes the temptation to create fake value/ devalue work created by fiat printing. The more humans
|    meddle the more they mess up.
|    
|    My personal view is that while a scarce unit of account is import it doesn’t solve for politics. I feel such
|    discussions are missing in the bitcoin space.
|    reply [1 reply]
Sasmora -- 381d
I really think this is a super timely debate.

In the end, power is wanted for the sake of power. The problem lies in the ethical and moral debate: what do you
want to achieve with that power?

I think the key lies in the collective, in that way of regulating each other, without obviously restricting
freedoms, which is why I used the word "regulate" rather than "control."

Bitcoin is like that; it is regulated by the community. I think it would be interesting to apply this practice
to other areas of life.
reply

Write a post

Sign in with a signing-capable method to publish.