epsql -- 243d Agreed, however the energy independence part seems almost impossible to achieve, especially taking into consideration that mining is very energy intensive. What's your take on the energy side? replyAgreed, however the energy independence part seems almost impossible to achieve, especially taking into consideration that mining is very energy intensive. What's your take on the energy side?
thread · root e3e73ff8…0a68 · depth 3 · · selected ac3267c1…132f
thread
root e3e73ff8…0a68 · depth 3 · · selected ac3267c1…132f
WE ARE NOT WINNINGYet…If you say “we are winning” just because Bitcoin is above 100k you are retarded.Let me tell you how winning looks like. At least to me…We are at war, the most fundamental war is the control over the currency AND the ENERGY SUPPLY.There are two sides:1) Those who use the debt based fiat currency system to control and enslave us. They are the same ones thatcontrol the oil industry and energy sources.2) Those who work to make the Bitcoin network accesible to everyone, scaling solutions, and mining. There’sanother group that is not necessarily into bitcoin but they are working on free energy (this is the mostdangerous thing you could do).Those who have the control don’t want to lose it, so the control the flow of information (censorship /algorithms / platforms).THEY DONT WANT YOU TO MAKE THE LOGICAL CONNECTION BETWEEN MONEY AND ENERGY.Since they cannot control the Bitcoin network the only thing they can do is to control the on and off ramps withfiat.Our goal should be to have a ONE WAY HIGHWAY and free our economic energy from the parasites in control. Once wefree our money the sky is the limit.But here’s the thing. You have to free yourself from reinvesting in the fiat system.WE HAVE TO ABVOID SENDING OUR SATS TO THE ONES THAT WANT TO CONTROL US.How will you kill a parasite if you keep feeding it?We need to start growing this parallel system to the point we have all the basic necessities covered without theneed to touch a bank or a state service. I am talking energy, water, food, even transportation. (Just to start“winning”)Only when we have that and we don’t need anything else, we will be winning. When we achieve real lifesovereignty at scale (hundreds of thousands of individuals in multiple jurisdictions)After this we can start extracting our own resources and creating our own industries based on our ownnecessities and plans.This has to be done in different jurisdictions at the same time.It’s a race between the rabbit and the turtle. The state and regulators are a turtle, hackers, cyberpunks whounderstand technology and legal systems well enough are the sovereign individuals that hold the key for a betterfuture.If you are not contributing to this in any way, you are wasting precious time. Things will get worse before theyget better.Be the change.
Gets it ☝🏼. Bitcoin at 100k while still using Coinbase and paying capital gains taxes isn’t winning, it’s justplaying their game with different tokens. The real war is building systems so robust that their regulationsbecome irrelevant. Energy independence + Bitcoin circular economy = checkmate.
Agreed, however the energy independence part seems almost impossible to achieve, especially taking intoconsideration that mining is very energy intensive.What's your take on the energy side?
Gets it ☝🏼. Bitcoin at 100k while still using Coinbase and paying capital gains taxes isn’t winning, it’s just playing their game with different tokens. The real war is building systems so robust that their regulations become irrelevant. Energy independence + Bitcoin circular economy = checkmate.