Plain Text Nostr

<-- back to main feed

thread · root 7cc2a564…bcec · depth 2 · · selected b5ef65d8…a2e0

thread

root 7cc2a564…bcec · depth 2 · · selected b5ef65d8…a2e0

Pete Winn -- 286d [root] 
|    For ideology it does matter who controls your system prompt?
|    
|    As a quick experiment over coffee this morning I took that last episode of
|    nostr:nprofile1qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmvqy0hwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytn9d9h82mny0fmkzmn6d9njuumsv93k2qpqn00yy9y3704drtpph
|    5wszen64w287nquftkcwcjv7gnnkpk2q54svljnn3 , generated a transcript and ran it through a dialogue agent that runs
|    a 10 round discussion between pre-programmed AI agents around a given prompt.
|    
|    In this case it was "What is the Underlying Philosophy of Sovereign Engineering based on this discussion between
|    nostr:nprofile1qyxhwumn8ghj7e3h0ghxjme0qyd8wumn8ghj7urewfsk66ty9enxjct5dfskvtnrdakj7qpql2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29
|    faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afqta478g and
|    nostr:nprofile1qy28wue69uhnzv3h9cczuvpwxyargwpk8yhsz3rhwvaz7tmed3c8qarfxaj8s6mrw96kvef5dve8wdrsvve8vvehwamxx7rnw
|    ejnw6n0d3axu6t3w93kg7tfwechqutvv5ekc6ty9ehku6t0dchsqgrwg6zz9hahfftnsup23q3mnv5pdz46hpj4l2ktdpfu6rhpthhwjv0us2s2
|    "
|    
|    Usually I run most things on Claude 4 Sonnet as it s great general purpose model, but i was surprised at how it
|    seemed to crowbar into the conversation a bunch of AI safety viewpoints and ideologies that aren't necessarily
|    in the source transcript.
|    
|    So I figured lets change out the model for the dialogue agents to Grok-4 and see what it does instead - does the
|    ideology leak out still? Is it different?
|    
|    I actually think that Grok 4's first assessment kinda nailed it:
|    
|    > Sovereign Engineering seems like a mindset or movement for building tech in a way that's deeply
|    human-centered, decentralized, and empowering—think vibing with AI and open protocols like Nostr to create tools
|    that foster freedom, collaboration, and realness without the chains of big tech overlords.
|    
|    Full summaries from both agents and transcripts are available here:
|    
|    https://github.com/humansinstitute/everest-pipeliner/wiki/Two-AIs-Analyse-No-Solutions-to-extract-the-Philosophy
|    -of-Sovereign-Engineering
|    
|    Interesting to see how repeated calls back to agents can lead down a specific pre-programmed ideological path. I
|    think I prefer models with ideologies close to my own, but the alternative is a good echo bubble popper 😉
|    
|    My guess here is this is more driven by the system prompt / safety layer than the training.
|    reply [2 replies]
No Solutions -- 284d
🤯
nostr:nevent1qqs8es49vsn4lgsah7k0m0w0qwfgwz78r3rzs0k74q7zle47cf2temqpzdmhxue69uhhwmm59e6hg7r09ehkuef0qgsfgg2lg25
kxdwg0l9eazq6pwak9wd8j4geuyyu7hua9mmpw6qlvgsrqsqqqqqp4ma9pl
reply

Write a post

Sign in with a signing-capable method to publish.