U-P-G-R-A-Y-E-D-D -- 114d It's literally been underperforming. I'm rooting for Bitcoin, but to deny the obvious is irrational. The run up to $100k was phenomenal, but a $2T asset isn't going to move like a it did when it was thousands of times smaller. reply [1 reply]It's literally been underperforming. I'm rooting for Bitcoin, but to deny the obvious is irrational. The run up to $100k was phenomenal, but a $2T asset isn't going to move like a it did when it was thousands of times smaller.
thread · root 23de4cf8…fb7f · depth 3 · · selected d98e9881…bc61
thread
root 23de4cf8…fb7f · depth 3 · · selected d98e9881…bc61
Interesting question.nostr:nevent1qqs2zzlc6v552hmglewkp3w89pusdqg79vag7apfnjnhnq2anjst06spzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtczyqze0cpgxygkjx2j2esku69qmc6n054595avl4wvvw9qfk4z7u3mvqcyqqqqqqg59z3nr
Boomer drivel. Imagine calling Bitcoin an underperforming asset for trading pretty much sideways for a year, yetsomehow waiting decades for a move is the way to go 😆
It's literally been underperforming.I'm rooting for Bitcoin, but to deny the obvious is irrational.The run up to $100k was phenomenal, but a $2T asset isn't going to move like a it did when it was thousands oftimes smaller.
Boomer drivel. Imagine calling Bitcoin an underperforming asset for trading pretty much sideways for a year, yet somehow waiting decades for a move is the way to go 😆
Sure it didn't do a phenomenal ATH year like most expected, but to bash it in context with precious metals is ridiculous. Metal bugs should humbly accept their profits and not forget the first time silver hit ~$50 was 45 years ago.