Kevin Alfred Strom -- 11d People who make things primarily decide the former; everybody decides the latter. They often make malicious or stupid decisions, of course. replyPeople who make things primarily decide the former; everybody decides the latter. They often make malicious or stupid decisions, of course.
thread · root 2a921c44…01ed · depth 4 · · selected e5579a53…ea11
thread
root 2a921c44…01ed · depth 4 · · selected e5579a53…ea11
Bitcoin-only companies: yes, we are only dealing with sound money and don’t support any shitcoins.Also Bitcoin-only companies: our budget is limited and we cannot pay as much as our competitors that do supportshitcoins.So how are they shitcoins if they make the difference between a successful company and an establishment thatsells virtue from mom’s basement?Or better yet, when does something stop being considered a shitcoin? Is it the market that redeems it? Time andresilience across bear markets? Having a real community of users?
Just because a thing makes a company financially successful doesn't mean that thing is worth a damn or shouldeven exist. People are, in the aggregate, of rather low intelligence and can easily be convinced to want stupidor harmful things, like tobacco and XRP.
Who decides what should exist and what shouldn’t?Who decides what an individual can do with his own body?
People who make things primarily decide the former; everybody decides the latter. They often make malicious orstupid decisions, of course.
Just because a thing makes a company financially successful doesn't mean that thing is worth a damn or should even exist. People are, in the aggregate, of rather low intelligence and can easily be convinced to want stupid or harmful things, like tobacco and XRP.
Vlad, Bitcoin Takeover Podcast -- 11d [parent] | reply [1 reply]Who decides what should exist and what shouldn’t? Who decides what an individual can do with his own body?