Plain Text Nostr

<-- back to main feed

thread · root bea8d7cc…a111 · depth 6 · · selected f0c59951…f5b3

thread

root bea8d7cc…a111 · depth 6 · · selected f0c59951…f5b3

William ₿ Travis -- 553d [parent] 
|    So for public companies, custodians are essential, at least for now. While I think having Coinbase be the sole
|    custodian is foolish, a custodial solution really is necessary.
|    reply [1 reply]
Zach⚡️ -- 553d
It's a matter of trust. I think there are many companies which could make a self custody protocol and implement
it successfully.

But where you're dealing with hundreds of billions worth of Bitcoin, you can't leave that up to a single person
or even a small group of people.

It needs active physical security, as well as professional cyber security and risk management. Having
specialized professionals which handle this makes sense and there will aleasy be a market for it.
reply [2 replies]
Zach⚡️ -- 553d [parent] 
|    Always*
|    reply
William ₿ Travis -- 553d [parent] 
     I think the people grousing about companies not self-custodying #bitcoin aren't thinking it through.
     reply

Write a post

Sign in with a signing-capable method to publish.