+- Patrick -- 2d -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[...]+ | | | It certainly could have been designed otherwise but the design choice of supply didn't guarantee the price increase | | per token. Arguably it could have caused later investors to never take the risk of the network and never invest | | causing the coins to remain worthless. Only from our past tense vision can we see the increase. At the time it was a | | worthless network. In terms of Halal there's no interest in the actual coinage so I can't understand where it would | | be Haram on simply a changing value but I'm not muslim and would love to hear more. | | | +-- reply --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---+It certainly could have been designed otherwise but the design choice of supply didn't guarantee the price increase per token. Arguably it could have caused later investors to never take the risk of the network and never invest causing the coins to remain worthless. Only from our past tense vision can we see the increase. At the time it was a worthless network. In terms of Halal there's no interest in the actual coinage so I can't understand where it would be Haram on simply a changing value but I'm not muslim and would love to hear more.
thread · root 1c3a8029…111f · depth 1 · · selected 1c3a8029…111f
thread
root 1c3a8029…111f · depth 1 · · selected 1c3a8029…111f
It certainly could have been designed otherwise but the design choice of supply didn't guarantee the priceincrease per token. Arguably it could have caused later investors to never take the risk of the network andnever invest causing the coins to remain worthless. Only from our past tense vision can we see the increase. Atthe time it was a worthless network. In terms of Halal there's no interest in the actual coinage so I can'tunderstand where it would be Haram on simply a changing value but I'm not muslim and would love to hear more.