Patrick -- 2d The divergence is what creates the new network of existence. There's currently no network that defines that private key holding value within the rule ecosystem of eCash. The eCash ecosystem won't start until their fork date so there's no history on that network because the network itself doesn't exist. Satoshi won't lose anything because even when eCash begins he will never go from 1 to 0. He will always be at 0. Even if Paul says it's a reassignment that's not theft because he isn't taking anything from anyone. He's just saying that if you want to play in his ecosystem this will be the starting rules and Satoshi won't get to play in it nad instead Satoshi's stake will be offered as an investment oppurtunity. I view this equivalent to a company that has been running for 10 years where all the employees decide that the owner doesn't contribute and decides let's create a new company that does the same thing and we're going to give every employee other than the owner the same share in this new company. They've not stolen anything from the original company. They've just decided we'll start a new company using our existing corporate stakes as the defining factor for the newly formed company. replyThe divergence is what creates the new network of existence. There's currently no network that defines that private key holding value within the rule ecosystem of eCash. The eCash ecosystem won't start until their fork date so there's no history on that network because the network itself doesn't exist. Satoshi won't lose anything because even when eCash begins he will never go from 1 to 0. He will always be at 0. Even if Paul says it's a reassignment that's not theft because he isn't taking anything from anyone. He's just saying that if you want to play in his ecosystem this will be the starting rules and Satoshi won't get to play in it nad instead Satoshi's stake will be offered as an investment oppurtunity. I view this equivalent to a company that has been running for 10 years where all the employees decide that the owner doesn't contribute and decides let's create a new company that does the same thing and we're going to give every employee other than the owner the same share in this new company. They've not stolen anything from the original company. They've just decided we'll start a new company using our existing corporate stakes as the defining factor for the newly formed company.
thread · root f638df76…6c2a · depth 2 · · selected 36715a1b…805b
thread
root f638df76…6c2a · depth 2 · · selected 36715a1b…805b
all ownership and transaction history pre fork already exists, the chains then diverge post fork blockpaul himself states in his post he is “reassigning” satoshi coin to his investors
The divergence is what creates the new network of existence. There's currently no network that defines thatprivate key holding value within the rule ecosystem of eCash. The eCash ecosystem won't start until their forkdate so there's no history on that network because the network itself doesn't exist. Satoshi won't lose anythingbecause even when eCash begins he will never go from 1 to 0. He will always be at 0.Even if Paul says it's a reassignment that's not theft because he isn't taking anything from anyone. He's justsaying that if you want to play in his ecosystem this will be the starting rules and Satoshi won't get to playin it nad instead Satoshi's stake will be offered as an investment oppurtunity.I view this equivalent to a company that has been running for 10 years where all the employees decide that theowner doesn't contribute and decides let's create a new company that does the same thing and we're going to giveevery employee other than the owner the same share in this new company. They've not stolen anything from theoriginal company. They've just decided we'll start a new company using our existing corporate stakes as thedefining factor for the newly formed company.